Trumpets of Trump:
I hope Trump will provide the answer
by declassifying the Roswell-1947 documents...
After Roswell-1947, why have the faces of all aliens been depicted as the
same face of the "breastfeeding woman" statuette in the Ankara
Archeological Museum? Was she an alien? The "breastfeeding woman" statuette was discovered in 1961 by archaeologist James Mellaart at
the Çatalhöyük site. Today, this significant piece resides in the Museum of
Anatolian Civilizations in Ankara, Turkey. The "breastfeeding woman"
statuette, dated to the end of 3000 BC and made of bronze, was found during excavations
at the Horoztepe Mound belonging to the Hatti civilization in the Erbaa
district of Tokat province in Turkey-Central Anatolia.
The International UFO Museum and Research Center explores the July 3, 1947, incident and its evolving place in pop-culture.
Were aliens with us for millions of years?
This is a serious non-science fiction question. Why
were the allegedly found “alien” body’s face near Roswell in 1947 and the face
of the "breastfeeding woman" statuette in Ankara Archeological Museum
depicted similarly? Or, why are all drawings of alien faces similar to the
"breastfeeding woman" statuette? Is it just because of the drawings
of the 1947 incident and others replicating the breastfeeding woman statuette?
It cannot be. Is there a link between aliens and breastfeeding women? There is
no link except the depiction of the eyes of all aliens and the "breastfeeding
woman's" eyes are the same. The statue, which is dated to the end of 3000
BC, was made with a casting technique. In many regions of Anatolia, there are
many more of this statue with the same faces and body. Precious metal stones and
terracotta samples of female figurines of this age, representing the mother
goddess, were also often found in tombs, which also means a technique that was
beyond the know-how of the Hatti period.
Here are some
sources further to be investigated, FYI:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzinHNSQbC8
https://newspaceeconomy.ca/2025/04/20/the-roswell-incident-what-really-happened-in-1947/
On July 8, 1947, the FBI
Dallas Field Office sent a teletype regarding a “flying disc” that resembled a
high altitude weather balloon found near Roswell, New Mexico. This single page
is a serial from the larger UFO release found at http://vault.fbi.gov/UFO.
The 1994 Air Force report concluded that the predecessor to
the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Army Air Forces, recovered debris from an Army Air
Forces balloon-borne research project code-named MOGUL. Records located
describing research carried out under the MOGUL project, most of which were
never classified (and publicly available), were collected, provided to GAO, and
published in one volume for ease of access for the general public.
This report discusses the results of this
exhaustive research and identifies the likely sources of the claims of
"alien bodies" at Roswell. Contrary to allegations, many of the
accounts appear to be descriptions of unclassified and widely publicized Air
Force scientific achievements. Other descriptions of "bodies" appear
to be actual incidents in which Air Force members were killed or injured in the
line of duty.
Air Force activities that occurred over a period
of many years have been consolidated and are now represented as having occurred
in two or three days in July 1947.
"Aliens" observed in the New Mexico
desert were actually anthropomorphic test dummies that were carried aloft by
U.S. Air Force high-altitude balloons for scientific research.
The "unusual" military activities in the
New Mexico desert were high altitude research balloon launch and recovery
operations. Reports of military units that always seemed to arrive shortly
after the crash of a flying saucer to retrieve the saucer and "crew,"
were actually accurate descriptions of Air Force personnel engaged in
anthropomorphic dummy recovery operations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Museum_of_Anatolian_Civilizations
Hearing Date: November
13, 2024 11:30 am
Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth
Unidentified
Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth
Cybersecurity,
Information Technology, and Government Innovation
National
Security, the Border, and Foreign Affairs
Witnesses and testimonies:
Dr. Tim Gallaudet
Rear Admiral, U.S. Navy (RET.)
Chief Executive Officer, Ocean STL Consulting, LLC
Document
Luis Elizondo
Author, and Former Department of Defense
Official
Document
Michael Gold
Former NASA Associate Administrator of Space Policy
and Partnerships; Member of NASA UAP
Independent Study Team
Document
Michael Shellenberger
Founder of Public
Published: Nov 13, 2024
Hearing Wrap Up: Transparency and Accountability Needed to Provide
Accurate Information on UAPs
to the American People
WASHINGTON—The Subcommittee on
Cybersecurity, Information Technology, and Government Innovation and the
Subcommittee on National Security, the Border, and Foreign Affairs held a joint
hearing titled, “Unidentified Anomalous
Phenomena: Exposing the Truth.”
Members discussed the Department of Defense (DoD) and the intelligence
community’s lack of transparency regarding UAPs, including undisclosed spending
on UAP-related programs and the national security implications of UAP
encounters at U.S. military installations. Members emphasized the need for
greater accountability from the DoD to share information with Congress and the
American people.
Key Takeaways:
The DoD has failed to provide
transparency on the existence and effectiveness of programs related to UAPs not
only to Congress but to the American people.
·
Dr. Tim Gallaudet—Rear Admiral, U.S. Navy
(Ret.)—emphasized the importance of transparency on UAPs: “There is a national security need for
more UAP transparency as well. In 2025, the U.S. will spend over $900 billion
on national defense, yet we still have an incomplete understanding of what is
in our airspace… The
failure of the Executive Branch to share UAP information with Congress is an
infringement on the legislative branch that undermines separation of powers and
may be creating a constitutional crisis.”
Congress and the American people have
fundamental questions on the topic of UAPs and incursions near sensitive
military installations. Increased disclosure and transparency are needed to
provide security and information.
·
Michael Shellenberger—Founder of Public—discussed the
Executive Branch’s responsibility to be forthcoming with Congress on
information related to UAPs: “There
is, however, a growing body of evidence that the government is not being
transparent about what it knows about unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP),
formerly called UFOs, and that elements within the military and IC are in
violation of their Constitutional duty to notify Congress of their operations.“
Member Highlights:
Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Information
Technology, and Government Innovation Chairwoman Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) discussed
the need for transparency on the level of taxpayer funds dedicated to UAP
research.
Chairwoman Mace: “I obviously would like to know how
much taxpayers are spending on this. You have the right to know. And if we are
spending money on something that doesn’t exist, why are we spending the money?
And if it does exist, why are we hiding it from the public? Of course, national
security is a big issue, and if there is technology that could harm us or our
allies that is in the hands of our adversaries, we obviously want to stay
ahead of that to the best of our abilities.”
